UAP Globe
Disputed

The Buga Sphere

Buga, Valle del Cauca  ·  2 March 2025  ·  Recovered object · Colombia  ·  Added 2026-06-11

The Buga Sphere - Buga, Valle del Cauca, 2 March 2025
The Buga Sphere — Buga, Valle del Cauca, 2 March 2025. Disputed. A counter-explanation or official finding exists but does not close the case.

Most UFO cases are lights in the sky. The Buga sphere is a metal ball you can hold: residents of a Colombian town reported watching it fly erratically before it landed in a field, and the recovered object, seamless, etched with symbols, has been passed between researchers and promoters ever since.

What did witnesses see at Buga?

In the air, a silent sphere moving erratically over Buga in March 2025, captured in witness video. Recovered, it is described as a seamless metal ball about the size of a football, with a honeycomb surface and etched symbols. Note: a separate viral TikTok clip showing a man handling a sphere on the ground, widely conflated with this case, is a staged video that did not come from Colombia and is excluded from this case file.

More footage and images of this sighting

El Pais Cali coverage of the recovered-object presentation: the engraved sphere shown in Colombia (left) and researchers measuring a sphere in a cleanroom (right). This is presentation media from the promoters; weigh it per the assessment.
El Pais Cali coverage of the recovered-object presentation: the engraved sphere shown in Colombia (left) and researchers measuring a sphere in a cleanroom (right). This is presentation media from the promoters; weigh it per the assessment.
Witness footage of the metallic sphere flying erratically over Buga in March 2025 before it reportedly fell to the ground.
La Saga report (Spanish) in which Jaime Maussan examines the recovered sphere. His involvement is itself a documented hoax-correlated signal; see the assessment.
Spanish-language field report on the investigation of the sphere, including the recovery story and lab work.

What is the official explanation?

No scientific consensus. A portable-spectrometer claim asserted elements not on the periodic table; a neuroscientist called it likely a human-made art project. Promoted by figures with heavy hoax records.

What did the witnesses think it was?

Buga residents reported watching it fly and land; researchers are openly split.

Is the Buga Sphere real? The two-pass assessment

Pass one is strong here on multiple fronts. The handled-sphere TikTok that attached itself to this case is a separate staged video and is excluded. For the Colombian object itself: VFX professionals (Corridor Crew) broke down the flight footage and found it does not hold up, analysts note the etched symbols resemble Hollywood alien-film glyphs, and the elements-not-on-the-periodic-table claim fails basic chemistry as worded. Jaime Maussan's central promotional role is a documented hoax-correlated signal. Pass two: a physically recovered artifact that could, in principle, be settled by an independent lab analysis with documented provenance, which has never been produced. Verdict: Disputed, leaning discredited, and a standing example of why footage must be traced to its origin before it is attached to an event.

Sources

More cases from this region: UFO sightings in Colombia

Related cases

← PreviousThe Moscow Pyramid Next →The New Jersey Drone Flap