The Two Objects Over Boiling Springs, South Carolina, 27 September 2026
An Air Force veteran filmed two dark objects drifting over his South Carolina neighbourhood at dusk and said they flew unlike anything he had seen. The silhouette changes shape twice a second.
What did witnesses see at Boiling Springs?
Two dark objects were filmed in formation over Boiling Springs, South Carolina, at dusk on 27 September 2026. The witness was loading boxes into his car at about 6:38 pm Eastern when he noticed them in the distance, could not make out what they were with the naked eye, and zoomed his phone to its limit until, in his words, it was impossible to see them.
The structured filing records two objects in a formation, facing southwest, apparent size of a quarter at arm's length, a distance of a few miles, movement described as random and smooth, and two witnesses. The reporter identifies himself as a veteran and adds that he spent a decade in the Air Force and saw some cool things, but that this was different. He states that he checked the available flight tracking platforms and that the flight style and shape did not match a common aircraft. On the five observables he answered no to wings, rotors, exhaust plume and noise, and yes to flight without visible means of lift.
The recording itself is a 36.9 second clip at 3840 by 2160 and 30 frames per second, pulled here from the report archive rather than from the Reddit re-encode. It shows a pale pink and blue twilight sky above treetops, with a house roof entering frame near the end as the camera pans down.
More footage and images of this sighting
Structured filing 13045 on ufosighting.report, relayed to r/UFOs by u/ufosightingsbot on behalf of the reporter View source
What is the official explanation?
There is no official narrative and none is likely. No agency has commented, no local outlet has covered the sighting, and the only public record of it is the witness's own structured filing and the Reddit thread that relayed it.
The filing's automatically generated sky context block reports that no bright satellites were visible overhead at that time and place, computed from a 27 September 2026 orbital catalogue. That block is a lead rather than a verdict, and in this case it is not load bearing: the sighting occurred before sunset, in daylight, so satellites were never a candidate.
What did the witnesses think it was?
The witness is a named Reddit account verified through a one time link as the person who filed the report, and the account of what he did is internally consistent. He saw something he could not resolve, reached for his phone, zoomed until the image broke down, and filed a structured report the same evening rather than a dramatic claim. He explicitly notes his own uncertainty by saying he could not see what they were with his naked eyes.
His service background is stated as a reason to take the observation seriously, and it is worth being precise about what it establishes. Time spent around military aircraft makes a person a good witness to military aircraft. It does not confer any particular advantage in judging a small dark shape at the limit of a phone's digital zoom, which is a problem of optics and angular resolution rather than of aviation experience. Nothing here suggests the witness is being anything other than straightforward.
Is the Two Objects Over Boiling Springs, South Carolina, 27 September 2026 real? The two-pass assessment
PASS ONE, HOW COULD THIS BE MUNDANE. The original file was retrieved from the report archive at 3840 by 2160, which is far better material than the Reddit copy, and measured directly. Note that the container reports an encoder of Lavf60.16.100 and carries no camera creation timestamp, so the archive copy has been rewritten by libavformat and cannot be used to date the recording independently; the oldest traceable appearance remains the filing itself, the same evening as the claimed sighting.
The objects are dark silhouettes against a bright sky, not luminous bodies, so they were detected as negative residuals against a blurred background. The decisive measurement is the stability of the outline. Sampling every frame across a three second window at the native 30 frames per second, the silhouette area has a mean of 870 square pixels with a standard deviation of 204, a coefficient of variation of 23.4 per cent. The aspect ratio swings between 0.79 and 3.59, that is from taller than wide to three and a half times wider than tall. The area oscillates about its own mean with thirteen zero crossings in three seconds, a period of roughly 2.2 cycles per second.
That is a wingbeat, and the numbers are not close to any alternative. A rigid body filmed from a fixed distance holds its area to within a few per cent; the comparable measurement on a rigid object in this archive's Mexico City case was a coefficient of variation of 2.5 per cent, an order of magnitude tighter. A balloon rotating in wind changes shape slowly and irregularly, not periodically at two cycles per second. Two hertz sits squarely in the flapping range of a medium to large bird. The two enlarged frames published with this case show the same object nine seconds apart as a flat extended bar and then as a compact notched form, which is what wings look like at the top and the middle of a stroke.
Every other element of the report fits once the identification is made. Dusk is when vultures, herons and crows move to roost in the South Carolina piedmont. Silence is expected of a bird a few hundred metres away, not evidence of exotic propulsion. No wings were reported visible, and at this angular size no wings would be resolvable, which is precisely why the filing's answer of no to wings carries no weight. Movement described as random and smooth is soaring flight. Absence from flight tracking platforms is expected, since birds do not carry transponders, and the witness's check of those platforms therefore excluded aircraft correctly while leaving the actual answer untouched. Two objects in loose formation is two birds.
PASS TWO, IF REAL, WHAT IS IT. There is very little room left. The shape change is measured on the witness's own untouched footage, it repeats throughout the clip, and no craft interpretation survives an outline that reorganises itself twice a second. The only opening would be if the tracked silhouette were an artifact of compression or of the extreme digital zoom, and that fails because the variation is periodic rather than random and because the two published frames show coherent, bird shaped structure rather than noise.
The verdict is Strongly Disputed rather than Discredited, and the distinction is deliberate and follows this archive's standing practice. An honest reporter filed a genuine recording of something he could not identify, and was straightforward about the limits of what he saw. A misidentification is not a hoax. The case is recorded here with the measurement that resolves it, so that the next person to encounter the clip does not have to repeat the work.
Sources
- www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1ws2x5f/two_slowmoving_objects_in_formation_changed/
- ufosighting.report/sighting/13045/two-slow-moving-objects-in-formation-changed-direction-smoot
- media.ufosighting.report/uploads/2026/09/36f4f91f7f384ed0a500af8fb8a77d90.mov
More cases from this region: UFO sightings in United States
