The Haywood County Light: A West Tennessee Radio Host Films a Fading Point of Light (Haywood County, Tennessee, broadcast 30 September 2026)
A radio host who presents a paranormal talk show filmed a bright light low over west Tennessee, checked his satellite and aircraft tracking apps, and found nothing scheduled to be there.
What did witnesses see at Haywood County?
A west Tennessee radio host filmed a bright point of light low over Haywood County and sent the footage to WBBJ. The station broadcast it on its 10pm newscast of 30 September 2026 under the chyron UFO SIGHTING REPORTED IN WEST TN.
The witness is Mickey Utley, who hosts a paranormal and extraterrestrial themed talk show called The Suppressed Signal on the Brownsville station WTBG. WBBJ reported that Utley was in Haywood County north of Brownsville, looking to the northwest toward Halls, and described the footage as capturing what appears to be a plane soaring in the night sky which vanishes without a trace and reappears moments later.
The archive obtained the broadcast package and measured the object directly. In the aired footage, which is a pillarboxed vertical phone recording inside the station's 16 by 9 frame at 960 by 540, a compact source sits above a dark treeline silhouette. Tracking it by subtracting a Gaussian blurred background and keeping only compact connected components, the object is present across the segment running from about 28 to 33 seconds into the package, with a residual peak between 186 and 220 grey levels over a sky background averaging about 30. Its area ranges from 9 to 20 pixels and its bounding box from 3 by 4 to 7 by 5 pixels, and over those four and a half seconds its centroid drifts about 22 pixels horizontally and 10 pixels vertically.
Enlarged, it is a single warm white point with no structure, no resolved body, no wings and no red or green navigation lights. That matters because the aviation answer predicts navigation lights, and at this resolution a nearby aircraft would normally show them.
More footage and images of this sighting
What is the official explanation?
There is no official narrative. No agency has commented on the sighting, and the archive found no Federal Aviation Administration, National Weather Service or military statement addressing it.
The only institutional reference point is the National UFO Reporting Center, which WBBJ consulted. The station reported, citing NUFORC in Davenport, Washington, that this would be the sixth UFO reported in the Brownsville area since 2000 and the first since 2023. The archive could not read the underlying NUFORC record directly, because nuforc.org answers automated retrieval with a Cloudflare challenge, so that figure is carried as WBBJ's reporting of NUFORC's count rather than as a figure this archive has audited.
With no official explanation offered, the case is tiered Unknown.
What did the witnesses think it was?
Utley described a light rather than a craft. It was really quiet and it was really dark, he told WBBJ. It was like a star or something that was really bright, but it was low on the horizon and it just started fading in and out.
He sought a second witness immediately, which is a point in the account's favour. I ran and got my wife because I just didn't want to be the only one to see it you know, so I got her and she went out there and her jaw hit the ground for like 10 seconds, he said. It was amazing, and so we come back out and they were gone.
He also did something most witnesses do not do, which is check instrumentation at the time. I even have the app for the Space Station. It alerts me. That's how much I'm into it, he said. It alerts me, but it didn't go off, Starlink didn't go off. There was nothing around in that area, no thunderstorms, just these crazy lights all over the place. WBBJ added that Utley is an amateur drone pilot and has reason to believe drones can also be ruled out.
Two cautions belong alongside that testimony, and neither is an accusation. Utley hosts a show devoted to this subject matter, so he is a motivated and practised observer rather than a naive one, which cuts both ways: he is more likely to be watching the sky and more likely to interpret what he sees through that frame. And his closing phrase, crazy lights all over the place, describes something plural, while the footage the archive measured shows one dominant point source. The station did not publish the rest of the recording, so that discrepancy cannot be resolved from the material released.
Is the Haywood County Light: A West Tennessee Radio Host Films a Fading Point of Light (Haywood County, Tennessee, broadcast 30 September 2026) real? The two-pass assessment
Pass one, how could this be mundane. The witness's own description is the strongest clue, and it points somewhere specific. A light that is very bright, low on the horizon, and fading in and out is the textbook presentation of a bright star seen at low altitude through a long atmospheric path, where extinction and scintillation make it pulse, change colour and appear to wink out entirely.
The archive tested that. For a site north of Brownsville at 35.65 north, 89.27 west, JPL Horizons places every planet either below the horizon or in the wrong part of the sky during the evening hours preceding the broadcast. At 7:30pm local Venus stood at azimuth 244 and altitude minus 0.3 degrees and Mercury at azimuth 253 and altitude 0.1, both effectively on the west southwest horizon and both far from the reported direction. Saturn was in the east at azimuth 92 to 124. Jupiter, Mars and the Moon were below the horizon or rising in the east. No bright planet was low in the northwest.
One star was. Arcturus, at magnitude minus 0.05 the brightest star in the northern sky, was setting in the west northwest through exactly that window: computed for the same site it stands at azimuth 281 and altitude 17.7 degrees at 8pm local, and azimuth 289 and altitude 5.9 degrees at 9pm, after which it sets. An object at six degrees altitude is seen through roughly ten air masses, which is the regime in which chromatic scintillation is most violent and in which a star visibly brightens, reddens and drops out. Arcturus is also a K type orange giant, so its intrinsic colour is warm, and the enlarged crop from the footage shows a warm white to faintly pink point. The archive's own alt azimuth routine was validated against the Horizons output and agreed to within 0.7 degrees in azimuth, with a 3.2 degree discrepancy in altitude attributable to refraction and to the approximate coordinates used for the control body.
That is a strong candidate and it is not a conclusion, for three reasons which the archive states rather than buries. First and most important, WBBJ never published the date of the sighting itself. The case is dated here by its oldest traceable appearance, the 30 September broadcast, exactly as this archive dates any undated footage, but the ephemeris argument above is computed for the evening preceding that broadcast and would shift if the recording were made on an earlier night. Without the sighting date the identification cannot be closed, and it is not closed. Second, the reported direction was northwest toward Halls, while Arcturus sat west northwest at azimuth 289, which is west of the stated bearing by perhaps twenty to thirty degrees. Recalled compass direction is the weakest field in any sighting account, so this is a soft objection rather than a fatal one, but it is a real gap. Third, the archive worked from a broadcast re-encode at 960 by 540 rather than from Utley's original file, so the photometry above measures the station's compressed copy.
The witness's instrument checks deserve a fair hearing and a fair caveat. That his International Space Station and Starlink alerts did not fire is genuine negative evidence against those two specific answers, and it is more than most witnesses offer. It is not evidence against aircraft, against the many satellites such apps do not alert on, or against a star, since no application alerts a user that Arcturus is setting.
Pass two, if it is real. If the object was a physical craft then the footage shows it at a distance great enough to render it as an unresolved point, which means nothing about its size, altitude or behaviour can be recovered from this recording. The vanishing and reappearing that WBBJ describes is the part a structured object would have to explain, and it is also precisely what atmospheric extinction does to a low star. No measurement available here distinguishes the two.
The archive tiers this Unknown. A named witness with a second witness, a real recording and an honest set of instrument checks is a legitimate report; the leading prosaic candidate is specific and strong but cannot be confirmed while the sighting date is unpublished. If the date is established, this case can be closed in either direction in a single ephemeris call, and the archive will revisit it.
Sources
- www.wbbjtv.com/2026/10/01/radio-host-shares-possible-ufo-sighting-with-wbbj/
- www.wbbjtv.com/video/2026/10/01/haywood-county-radio-host-captures-possible-ufo-sighting-video/
- ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons/
- nuforc.org/
More cases from this region: UFO sightings in United States
